Sample dossier
195 pages, exported from CE-Copilot and published unchanged. The example is the RSZ-2600 robotic welding cell, a special-purpose machine forming an assembly of machinery, with everything the software generates for a project: risk assessment, list of standards, Declaration of Conformity, technical file, test reports, functional safety and cybersecurity.
This is the English edition of the dossier, exported from the English edition of the platform. The same project exists in German, and the Declaration of Conformity can also be exported in French and Italian.
No sign-up, no email address required · PDF, 2.3 MB · as of 28 September 2026
Contents
All modules work on the same data within the project: the hazards from the risk assessment feed the safety functions, the standards selected appear in the Declaration of Conformity. The full export bundles them in this order, with a clickable table of contents.
Each hazard as its own block: life phase, type of hazard, risk number before measures (severity × probability), protective measures following the three-step method of EN ISO 12100 with the corresponding requirements from Annex III of the Machinery Regulation, residual risk and acceptance decision.
42 hazards·pp. 3–119·Landscape
The standards selected, separated into type A, B and C standards, with full title and the directive under which they are harmonised. Technically applied rules without harmonisation appear in the same list, recognisable by the absence of a directive assignment.
24 standards·pp. 120–122
The signed declaration, with manufacturer, product details including serial number, legislation applied, the list of standards from module 2 and the chosen conformity assessment procedure.
1 declaration·pp. 123–124
The checklist of the technical file per Annex IV Part A of the Machinery Regulation: what is available, with which status and note. Drawings, circuit diagrams and calculations are recorded and managed here, not replaced.
97 % complete·pp. 125–134
Electrical testing per EN 60204-1, functional testing of the safety devices and further test blocks, each with test item, mandatory/optional flag, result and test date.
74 of 78 test items·pp. 135–148
For each safety function, the required performance level (PLr) with the risk graph parameters, the result taken from SISTEMA (category, PFHd) and the verification PL ≥ PLr. The calculation itself remains in SISTEMA.
5 safety functions·pp. 149–150
Classification and obligations in force depending on the date of placing on the market, inventory of interfaces and assets, cybersecurity risk assessment, requirements matrix per Annex I, third-party components, support period, vulnerability handling, reporting process under Article 14 and the user information per Annex II.
8 of 9 sections fully documented·pp. 151–164
The chapter texts of the operating instructions with subheadings, lists and tables, because the instructions form part of the technical file. Illustrations, residual hazards and the list of standards appear in chapters 1 and 2 and in the separate export of the instructions that is supplied with the machine.
13 chapters·pp. 165–195
Limits
The standards check behind the document
Every standard number named by the AI is checked in CE-Copilot against the catalogue of standards listed in the Official Journal of the EU. Anything that cannot be confirmed there is flagged visibly by the software in the project and in the export, rather than the number being silently issued as a valid standard. In the sample project, all of these flags were resolved during the technical revision; the current export therefore contains no open markers. That is precisely the end state the check is meant to produce: it shows the places where your technical decision is required, until none remain open.
And the most important point last: A sample dossier is not a blank cheque. The technical review and the release of the documentation remain with the manufacturer. The software structures, substantiates and keeps the documents together; the signature is yours.
From the directive check to the Declaration of Conformity in one application, under the Machinery Directive today and under the Machinery Regulation from 20 January 2027.
What changes on the cut-over date in concrete terms: for six machinery categories in Annex I Part A of the Machinery Regulation (including removable mechanical transmission devices with their guards, vehicle servicing lifts, cartridge-operated fixing tools and safety-related AI components), self-assessment via harmonised standards is no longer sufficient; there, the notified body becomes mandatory. Check whether your machine is affected
No credit card required · trial with the Starter feature set
The personal demo: 30 minutes, free of charge and without obligation.